in THIS forum; cease!
-Terry Liberty Parker
Owner/moderator,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Boyd, until Paul responds, here's some from www.OneLook.com
> >
> >
> > Quick definitions (sentience)
> >
> > noun: the readiness to perceive sensations; elementary or
> > undifferentiated consciousness
> > (Example: "Gave sentience to slugs and newts- Richard Eberhart")
> > noun: state of elementary or undifferentiated consciousness
> > noun: the faculty through which the external world is
> > apprehended
>
> This quality is readily apparent in fetuses at least at 6+ months.
Third trimester. Possibly before then. It should have bearing on
this discussion. And yes Paul will say that as it is in the body of
another, it has no rights. But is this true and correct really? If
it is human life but has no rights, are we treading on thin ice by
denying rights to human life? If it is not human life, then what is
it? If it is a decision completely up to the mother to be, at what
point does it become initiated aggression against an innocent life?
And I know Paul's answer already. I am looking for an actual real
answer though. One that uses libertarian thought and philosophy, so
don't respond Paul, please. Your input is not needed on these
questions.
>
> BWS
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
