> Boyd is probably tired of arguing in circles with someone who has
> a static position. There simply is no flexibility in many of the
> positions you take (Of course there really isn't anything wrong
> with that). Although I disagree with about everything you say, you do
> make some logical arguments and always offer explanations for your
> positions without remorse, which is refreshing and admirable. BWS
> is simply wrong on this one and his post is equal to an argumentum ad
> hominem.
>
> Bucky
I know logic, logic is a friend of mine, Paul's positions are in no way logical.
It is not his inflexibility that gets me, it is that most of his statements are not logical, do not agree with libertarian philosophy, and are just plain not consistent with reality.
BWS
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
