Harland, don't intersperse your comments within my post.  It makes
things hard to follow for the readers.  

You falsely claim that the Palestinians (there are no such people)
built orchards and homes on land they owned for hundreds of years. 
This is an outright lie.  First there are no "Palestinian" people
anymore than there are "Rocky Mountain People".  There has never been
a nation of "Palestine" during the entire recorded history of the
world.   The squatters in that area who built orchards or homes, did
so on land they did not own.  In fact they didn't own a single grain
of sand, let alone the houses they built on someone else's land.

They didn't own land.  They were evacuated from land they did not own
and were given some land for the first time in all of humanity in
1949.  But rather than be grateful that they finally actually own
land, they attacked the Jewish people who were moving in to the land
they legitimately and honestly owned.  They cowardly murdered women
and children rather than face those they claim were their enemy.

The Jewish people gave the squatters an adequate amount of time to
evacuate the land they NEVER owned before coming in and forcing those
who remained to either leave or be killed for refusing to leave.

You further lie by claiming the land was privately owned by the
fictional "Palestinian" people which again is completely and totally
false.  They didn't own the land.  They didn't own a single square
inch of it.

Squatters have no rights, and no ownership of land they squat on.  It
doesn't matter if they squat for 1 day or 1000 years.



 

--- In [email protected], Harland Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Since when do the people of that region follow English common law?
> > I don't even subscribe to it.
> They may not.  But the message claimed that the UK won the land of the
> Palestinians from the Turks, in World War I, and then gave it to the
Jews.
> Surely the UK must follow their own laws.  Under British law the
> Palestinians should have owned their own land; it would not have
belonged to
> the government. 
> 
> > 
> > Whether or not someone would have a measure of ownership in common
> > law, or any other law is irrelevant.  This isn't about what is legal
> > or illegal, it's about what is right and wrong.
> Exactly. The Palestinians built villages, farms, and orchards, on
the land
> they owned for hundreds of years.  The Israeli army attacked them,
killing
> many civilians, and destroying their villages.  Hundreds of
thousands fled
> in 1949, and have been living in refugee camps, raising their
children and
> grandchildren, ever since.  There are over 400,000 Palestinian refugees
> still in Lebanon, today.  The Israeli government will not let them
return
> home. This is clearly wrong.
> 
> > 
> > When you own land, it's yours and nobody else's forever.  No person,
> > group of people, or government have any legitimate claim to it,
> > whether in easements, squatter rights, or anything else.
> Yes, and the land of people of Palestine belongs to them.  Private
property
> cannot be "honestly acquired" by war. It rightfully belongs to the
private
> owner, no matter what governments may do.
> 
> > 
> > No person, group of people, or government has any legitimate authority
> > to tell you what you can or can't do on your own land assuming your
> > actions don't infringe on the equal rights of others or trespass
> > against them such as ground water pollution.
> I agree.  Why should the Israeli government be any exception?
> 
> Harland Harrison
> Libertarian Party of San Mateo County CA









ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to