--- In [email protected], "terry12622000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The presidential line item veto is a bad idea because it gives to > much extra power to the president. The preident has the power to veto > the whole bill and if Congress wants the whole bill bad enough they > can over ride the veto with sufficent votes. The closest thing we had > to a Classic Liberal preisent since the War of Northern Agression was > Grover Clevland who had the guts of his convictions to veto more > times than any other president, not far from 700 vetos over his two > seperate terms. So far Bush jr. I think has only use the veto 1 > time ______________________________________________________________________
Once again, I say that if a bill has enough "stuff" in it that a line item veto is a concern, it is a bad bill. No law passed by any government body should have more than one "line". ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
