I read 100% of your post and like virtually all of your other posts, it is the polar opposite of the libertarian position.
--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My position is the pure libertarian viewpoint, as you should see if you > took time to read my response. > > David Macko > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:00 PM > Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I > > > He was answering my question about using the government to make laws > enforcing religious morality (specifically laws pertaining to fidelity > ) because he stated that he'd support the freedom of > "unmarried/unengaged" women to have any sex they wanted if they were > over the age of 18 which is a disturbing and extremely non-libertarian > viewpoint. > > --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <statonberg@> wrote: > > > > David, > > > > What does that have to do with your advocacy of state-prohibited > > interracial marriage? As you can see, there is great doubt about > > what exactly you do believe. > > > > -Mark > > > > ++++++++++++++++ > > > > I believe that the only legitimate purposes of government are > > to > > protect the lives, liberty and property of innocent persons. > > The purpose > > of government is not to prevent sins which do not harm innocent > > third > > parties without their consent. Sins which harm innocent third > > parties > > without their consent, such as murder, rape, robbery or fraud, > > should be > > punished by a legitimate government. It is a proper purpose of > > government, > > derived from protection of property, to uphold voluntarily > > arranged > > contracts among adults. Without the sanctity of contracts no > > free > > society could survive. > > If a woman voluntarily agrees to faithfully, lovingly and > > obediently > > serve the pleasure of a husband, she would be in violation of > > that > > contract and committing fraud if she served the pleasure of > > another > > man for money, i.e. as a harlot, whore, prostitute etc. or for > > fun > > i.e. as a slut, loose woman, promiscuous woman, tramp etc. Due > > to sexual diseases, > > the fraud could have deadly consequences for her husband or > > fiancé > > or cause him great financial loss if she conceived a bastard > > and her husband > > falsely believed that it was his child and provided the child > > with food, > > clothing, shelter, health care and education until adulthood. > > Therefore, such fraud violation should be punishable in a > > libertarian > > society. Other possible limiting contracts might include > > teaching at a Christian > > school, but marriage, including engagement to be married, is > > obviously the most important. > > > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > > David Macko > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
