If that happen, the jury should not be touched they are not
proscuting or enforcing but the Sheriff and Prosucutor probably
should be brought up on charges.If the crimnal trial fails the
victims family or friends should be allowed to sue in civil court,
not only the husband but the Sheriff and Prosecutor.
That is another reason that I think both parties in a jury
trial should have a say so in picking the jury and judge, of course
if the prosecutor has no concept of justice then he should go on
trial.--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Of course, if another important premise of libertarianism,
> jury nullification, again regained its status, we might see
> situations such as I understand occurred in Texas until
> fifty years ago. Perhaps Terry could confirm this for us.
> According to the information I heard, if a man found his
> wife serving the pleasure of another man and shot both
> of them he would not be brought to trial since the prosecutor,
> sheriff and other authorities understood that no jury would
> convict him anyway.
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul T. Ireland
> To: David Macko
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I
>
>
> If the contract of marriage is broken, any party involved can
divorce the other. Other than that, the government has nothing
legitimate to say in the matter. Any other position is not
libertarian. It wouldn't matter if your wife chose to have sex with
the whole defensive line of the Oakland Raiders; no punishment should
ever be dished out by government.
>
> Prostitution and all consensual sex should be legal at all times
regardless of a person's relationship status.
>
>
>
>
> On 9/18/06, David Macko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not believe that prostitution should be illegal except
where
> it would break a contract.
> That is the libertarian position.
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul T. Ireland
> To: David Macko
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I
>
>
> I read 100% of your post and like virtually all of your other
posts, it is the polar opposite of the libertarian position.
>
>
>
>
> On 9/18/06, David Macko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My position is the pure libertarian viewpoint, as you
should see if you
> took time to read my response.
>
> David Macko
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:00 PM
> Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I
>
>
> He was answering my question about using the government
to make laws
> enforcing religious morality (specifically laws
pertaining to fidelity
> ) because he stated that he'd support the freedom of
> "unmarried/unengaged" women to have any sex they wanted
if they were
> over the age of 18 which is a disturbing and extremely
non-libertarian
> viewpoint.
>
> --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <statonberg@>
wrote:
> >
> > David,
> >
> > What does that have to do with your advocacy of state-
prohibited
> > interracial marriage? As you can see, there is great
doubt about
> > what exactly you do believe.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++
> >
> > I believe that the only legitimate purposes of
government are
> > to
> > protect the lives, liberty and property of innocent
persons.
> > The purpose
> > of government is not to prevent sins which do not harm
innocent
> > third
> > parties without their consent. Sins which harm innocent
third
> > parties
> > without their consent, such as murder, rape, robbery or
fraud,
> > should be
> > punished by a legitimate government. It is a proper
purpose of
> > government,
> > derived from protection of property, to uphold
voluntarily
> > arranged
> > contracts among adults. Without the sanctity of
contracts no
> > free
> > society could survive.
> > If a woman voluntarily agrees to faithfully, lovingly
and
> > obediently
> > serve the pleasure of a husband, she would be in
violation of
> > that
> > contract and committing fraud if she served the
pleasure of
> > another
> > man for money, i.e. as a harlot, whore, prostitute etc.
or for
> > fun
> > i.e. as a slut, loose woman, promiscuous woman, tramp
etc. Due
> > to sexual diseases,
> > the fraud could have deadly consequences for her
husband or
> > fiancé
> > or cause him great financial loss if she conceived a
bastard
> > and her husband
> > falsely believed that it was his child and provided the
child
> > with food,
> > clothing, shelter, health care and education until
adulthood.
> > Therefore, such fraud violation should be punishable in
a
> > libertarian
> > society. Other possible limiting contracts might include
> > teaching at a Christian
> > school, but marriage, including engagement to be
married, is
> > obviously the most important.
> >
> > For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> > David Macko
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Your Friend in Liberty,
>
>
> Paul T. Ireland
> Libertarian Congressional Candidate
> California - District 35
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.electpaulireland.com
>
>
>
> --
> Your Friend in Liberty,
>
>
> Paul T. Ireland
> Libertarian Congressional Candidate
> California - District 35
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.electpaulireland.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
