----- Original Message -----
From: David Macko
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
You bring up a very important point for a future libertarian society.
The government and the establishment media encourage all manner
of "diversity". In a libertarian society, it would be most wise to encourage
people with diverse beliefs and behaviors not to live together.
In the theoretical libertarian town about which we are speaking, if half
the population regards adultery as a crime which justifies an outraged husband
to take direct action, somewhat in the manner that you would take direct
action against someone breaking into your house at 3:00 AM and the other
half regards adultery and the seduction of other men's wives as no big thing,
the result will be civil war between those of you who want to kill cuckolded
husbands and those of us who would not condemn them for permanently
eliminating the adulterers who had violated their rights as husbands.
For life, liberty, justice and peace,
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:28 AM
Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
If I lived in a community where jury nullification was being misused
to allow the violation of the rights of women by allowing men to
murder their wives, I'd take the law into my own hands and start
killing everyone who served on a jury and nullified it in such cases.
--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That was a really low blow to compare me to Dondero or Cohen.
> What would you do about a community with jury nullification
> which defacto allowed husbands to punish adultery in the manner
which I described?
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul T. Ireland
> To: David Macko
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re:
[Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I
>
>
> Heck, why stop 50 years ago? Why not go back to the middle-ages
where we could stone her to death, or put her in the stocks to be
beaten and humiliated to death? How about we setup sharia law where
we can burn her to death? Is that truly what you consider to be
libertarian? If so, allow me to be the first to say you are every bit
as libertarian than Eric Dondero or Bruce Cohen...
>
> Ghengis Khan, Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9/18/06, David Macko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Of course, if another important premise of libertarianism,
> jury nullification, again regained its status, we might see
> situations such as I understand occurred in Texas until
> fifty years ago. Perhaps Terry could confirm this for us.
> According to the information I heard, if a man found his
> wife serving the pleasure of another man and shot both
> of them he would not be brought to trial since the prosecutor,
> sheriff and other authorities understood that no jury would
> convict him anyway.
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
