Wow. You think killing adulterers is a good idea? Would this be another government intrusion in the bedroom, or just simple murder by her husband that would be smiled upon by government? If she violates her marriage contract, why is murder the first thought you can come up with? Why not divorce? Why not sue for damages?
Why is killing women such a good idea to you? As a libertarian, I favor getting government out of the marriage equation all together. No licenses. No data tracking. No interference or referees. Private arbitration. The REAL libertarian solution. Further, I don't view women as property, potentially subject to government sanctioned murder by her husband for the crime of spreading her legs. And no, your life boat scenario (always a favorite of those grasping at straws) of STDs doesn't justify government sanctioned slaughter of unfaithful wives. Call me crazy, but I don't have such murderous desires or view my wife as property. But then, I'm a dirty miscegenationist mongrel myself. I can't be expected to know any better. Macko has the scientific "proof" to back it up - Haiti and Egypt. Enough said. __________________________________________________________________ James Landrith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/ __________________________________________________________________ _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Macko Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I ----- Original Message ----- From: David Macko To: Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:50 AM Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I You bring up a very important point for a future libertarian society. The government and the establishment media encourage all manner of "diversity". In a libertarian society, it would be most wise to encourage people with diverse beliefs and behaviors not to live together. In the theoretical libertarian town about which we are speaking, if half the population regards adultery as a crime which justifies an outraged husband to take direct action, somewhat in the manner that you would take direct action against someone breaking into your house at 3:00 AM and the other half regards adultery and the seduction of other men's wives as no big thing, the result will be civil war between those of you who want to kill cuckolded husbands and those of us who would not condemn them for permanently eliminating the adulterers who had violated their rights as husbands. For life, liberty, justice and peace, David Macko [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
