I was not necessarily endorsing the idea generally. However, if I had a wife
and I found her voluntarily serving the pleasure of another man, the thought
just might cross my mind. Also, if I were on the jury for the trial of a man
who lost his temper over such an outrage, I might well let him off.
I agree with you 99%. I don't view wives as slaves either. Slaves obey
through fear. Wives should obey through love. I would not even advocate
government intrusion into contracts where the poor p*ssywh*pp*d male
did not require his wife to serve his pleasure wherever, whenever and however
he wished.
Also, as I previously stated, there have been some quite good outcomes from
miscegenation and it should not be outlawed, although as you noted I do think
that there were a lot of bad outcomes.
By the way, have you ever wondered why it is perfectly ok to want to preserve
some endangered species such as whales while it brings opprobrium, insult and
downright hate to want to preserve other endangered groups such as white people?
 I hope that this clarifies my views.

For life, liberty, justice and peace,
David Macko

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Landrith 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:35 AM
  Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The 
Fallacy of Open I


  Wow. You think killing adulterers is a good idea? Would this be another
  government intrusion in the bedroom, or just simple murder by her husband
  that would be smiled upon by government? If she violates her marriage
  contract, why is murder the first thought you can come up with? Why not
  divorce? Why not sue for damages?

  Why is killing women such a good idea to you?

  As a libertarian, I favor getting government out of the marriage equation
  all together. No licenses. No data tracking. No interference or referees.
  Private arbitration. The REAL libertarian solution. Further, I don't view
  women as property, potentially subject to government sanctioned murder by
  her husband for the crime of spreading her legs. And no, your life boat
  scenario (always a favorite of those grasping at straws) of STDs doesn't
  justify government sanctioned slaughter of unfaithful wives.

  Call me crazy, but I don't have such murderous desires or view my wife as
  property. 

  But then, I'm a dirty miscegenationist mongrel myself. I can't be expected
  to know any better. Macko has the scientific "proof" to back it up - Haiti
  and Egypt. 

  Enough said.

  __________________________________________________________
  James Landrith
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547
  AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159
  MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith
  Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com
  The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com
  The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/
  __________________________________________________________

  _____ 

  From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of David Macko
  Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:00 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
  Fallacy of Open I

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Macko 
  To: Libertarian@ <mailto:Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:50 AM
  Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
  Fallacy of Open I

  You bring up a very important point for a future libertarian society.
  The government and the establishment media encourage all manner
  of "diversity". In a libertarian society, it would be most wise to encourage
  people with diverse beliefs and behaviors not to live together.
  In the theoretical libertarian town about which we are speaking, if half
  the population regards adultery as a crime which justifies an outraged
  husband
  to take direct action, somewhat in the manner that you would take direct
  action against someone breaking into your house at 3:00 AM and the other
  half regards adultery and the seduction of other men's wives as no big
  thing,
  the result will be civil war between those of you who want to kill cuckolded
  husbands and those of us who would not condemn them for permanently
  eliminating the adulterers who had violated their rights as husbands.

  For life, liberty, justice and peace,
  David Macko

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to