ma ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Vic, > > Same question to you: > What is your philosophy concerning the NAP? Do you understand / > acknowledge / accept it?
as far as I am concerned NAP is a bilateral proposition, not a unilateral proposition. that means both sides must hold the same position and agree to it. otherwise all bets are off. you can not apply NAP one sided. nor should you have any form of truce with a country that violates principles of freedom, thats like a pact with the devil. thats unacceptable. yet NAP seems to be commonly interepreted as an excuse to do nothing, hide and run, stay uninvolved show no compasion and offer no help nor come to anyones aid whose freedoms are being brutalised. how did this one sided view of freedom ever come about? its just so disapointing to me, to see the LP having devolved to a party of no action, no initiative and no give a shit. Vic ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
