John Peterson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Replace those two central pyramids with four tets? Should be just as easy >> and arguably just as good, especially if we do the same sort of >> geometrically adaptive axis selection that we do in tet refinement now. > > Hey, that's a pretty good idea! I will move that to the top of the > list of candidates. The adaptive axis selection can probably go on the back burner, though. It was critical for Tets since the effect of bad axis selection there is cumulative. For Pyramids, a bad selection would only happen once and wouldn't be exacerbated by the subsequent Tet refinement. > For non-homogeneous refinement > patterns, this assumption might not even make sense. A pyramid has > five sides but its tet children will only have 4, for example. Ben appears to have already figured out this (in another context): the final pyramid side is the bottom, which Tets will never overlap. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
