On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, John Peterson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Paul T. Bauman <[email protected]> wrote:
If there are no plans to change to autotools (or better, modern
build system *cough* SCons *cough*) then consider this a feature
request for "make install" behavior for the reasons listed in my
previous email.
This would be my vote (add make install to existing build system) as well.
I kind of liked that "we move to automake, but someone other than me
does all the work" option.
But just adding a "make install" target would be easier.
I think this is the biggest 'pro' you listed that we are currently
lacking...
For me the only unlisted pro of automake is that IDEs understand it...
but that's just based on my failed attempt to import libMesh into
eclipse (or was it some KDE thing?) years ago; it may be outdated
info.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
