Then why are we passing it in? Seems like we should just get the dimension
of the element from elem->dim()....
That's what gave me pause in the first place...
Derek
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> FEInterface::inverse_map() takes a "dimension" parameter.... what
>> dimension is that? Is that the dimension of the element or the
>> dimension of the mesh?
>>
>
> Looks like the dimension of the element. dim just gets used in a
> switch statement to decide which FE<dim,type>::inverse_map to use.
> ---
> Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
