Wow - _3_. That is crazy!
An assert is a good idea for now... maybe add this to the list of
interfaces to be deprecated? It would be easy to make a stub version that
kept the current calling sequence and had a libmesh_deprecated() call in
it... then called the new version...
Derek
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> Then why are we passing it in?
>>
>
> Hell if I know. "svn blame" says that the API dates from revision
> *3*, so while I can confidently answer "we're passing it in for
> backwards compatibility" now, I can't say whether it started as a
> design mistake or just a now-atavistic design choice.
>
>
> Seems like we should just get the dimension of the element from
>> elem->dim()....
>> That's what gave me pause in the first place...
>>
>
> We ought to at least be asserting they're equal, huh. I might add
> that after I'm done putting together 0.7.3 final.
> ---
> Roy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
