On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Derek Gaston wrote: > Then why are we passing it in?
Hell if I know. "svn blame" says that the API dates from revision *3*, so while I can confidently answer "we're passing it in for backwards compatibility" now, I can't say whether it started as a design mistake or just a now-atavistic design choice. > Seems like we should just get the dimension of the element from > elem->dim().... > That's what gave me pause in the first place... We ought to at least be asserting they're equal, huh. I might add that after I'm done putting together 0.7.3 final. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
