On 4/3/12 3:28 PM, "Roy Stogner" <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> Seems like we should just get the dimension of the element from
>> elem->dim()....
>> That's what gave me pause in the first place...
>
> We ought to at least be asserting they're equal, huh. I might add
> that after I'm done putting together 0.7.3 final.
Agreed. Cruft that old may predate elem->dim() for all I know.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
