On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:16 AM, David Knezevic <david.kneze...@akselos.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We ought to just store order internally as an int, change the existing
>> constructors to convert, and add new constructors that take int.
>> ---
>> Roy
>>
>
>
> Sounds good to me. The enum Order seems unnecessarily restrictive, so it'd
> be good to store order internally as an int.
>
> By the way, I'm not up to speed on the "sparse scalars" that John
> mentioned. What does that refer to exactly?
>
It used to be that SCALARS had to be coupled to all other dofs in the
system, but I think that restriction has been relaxed.
--
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
