On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, David Knezevic wrote: > The order member in FEType is public, and it's used in many places, > so changing the order member necessitates lots of other changes in > the library (for example, consider all the methods in the FE class > that expect fe_type.order to provide an Order enum).
And we don't want to do that, at least not without years of backwards compatibility, because there's probably a lot of non-library code relying on fe_type.order too. > I'm not sure I see a good way to do this while retaining backwards > compatibility. With an accessor class? Create an OrderShim class that stores an int internally, gets queried by the FEType class to return that int, but has an operator Order to implictly convert that int to an Order. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
