Good evening, Travis... Travis Pahl wrote:
> Checks would not bounce IF THEY SPENT LESS. If they do not send > less, then they deserve to lose in the next election. It's a minor nit to pick, but I think a pretty good one, actually. When was the last time you heard of a government check bouncing? Isn't the mystique of government spending really all about having checking accounts where the bank never calls to tell you your bank account is in overdraft? So, the logical question is, what motivation is there to curtail spending when, for the most part, the ceiling's the limit? What is nearly as deplorable as the waste and out-of-control spending at the federal level is that the majority of people see nothing wrong with the picture. Dave -- Dave Laird ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The Used Kharma Lot Web Page: http://www.kharma.net updated 11/24/2004 Usenet news server : news://news.kharma.net Fortune Random Thought For the Minute Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. -- Euripides _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
