At 10:42 22/2/01 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>Peter Donald wrote:
>
>> A few days ago I indicated the 4 paths I saw were
>>
>> 1. component repository (ie ToolForge+CJAN)
>> 2. vetted/tested/approved components (ie Avalon+CJAN)
>> 3. base util (Something similar to AUT - Apache Utility Toolkit).
>> 4. gathering
>>
>> (3) is easily doable within current apache model. I believe Costin wants to
>> work in (1) and Avalon covers enough of (2) that I don't see it worth
>> creating a new project for. So what am I saying? ;) I am +1 for all but (2)
>> which I am -1 on at the moment.
>
>Except that Avalon doesn't appear to be a 'catalog' of separate,
>independant components that are individually documented, buildable,
>etc...
you can always enhance the Avalon project in such a manner ;) Done well
enough it could be a great precursor to CJAN ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
