[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Point of distribution" ? I suppose the project(s) that vote to release a
> component will be the point of distribution.
Then we're fine. The underlying concern was that the shared CVS could
become a backdoor where code might be released under the Apache brand
without the usual peer review by a subproject. (While I know * you *
would never do this, we have to write this for everyone.)
> And of course, the current proposal that was voted include the option for
> jakarta projects to sponsor sub-components - and I don't think you can
> change that without invalidating the original vote.
We've simply been been asked to clarify "sponsor", just as we have
clarified some other points.
I think we may now be down to
"20. A CVS repository will be available to all Jakarta committers as a
workplace for new packages or other projects. Before release to the
public, code or documentation developed here must be accepted into the
Commons or sponsored by another Jakarta subproject. The sponsoring
subproject(s) will distribute the code or documentation along with the
rest of their codebase."
Does that seem OK?
-Ted.
