[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [Responding to Ted:]
>
> It's obvious you prefer one development model, with components developed
> by a group of commiters who control it's fate.
>
> I prefer another - where control is shared by the different projects that
> are using the component.
What is the difference? Wouldn't that shared control be effectively a
group of people, committers, who control it's fate? So what if they
come from different projects - they still are the committers that work
on the component...
Is there really a difference?
> And the issue here is that people who prefer the first model are not
> willing to tolerate other solutions.
Sorry, I don't buy that assertion, mainly because the only 'other
solution' you offered is operationally the same as the first.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
