+1
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "Point of distribution" ? I suppose the project(s)
> that vote to release a
> > component will be the point of distribution.
>
> Then we're fine. The underlying concern was that the
> shared CVS could
> become a backdoor where code might be released under
> the Apache brand
> without the usual peer review by a subproject.
> (While I know * you *
> would never do this, we have to write this for
> everyone.)
>
> > And of course, the current proposal that was voted
> include the option for
> > jakarta projects to sponsor sub-components - and I
> don't think you can
> > change that without invalidating the original
> vote.
>
> We've simply been been asked to clarify "sponsor",
> just as we have
> clarified some other points.
>
> I think we may now be down to
>
> "20. A CVS repository will be available to all
> Jakarta committers as a
> workplace for new packages or other projects. Before
> release to the
> public, code or documentation developed here must be
> accepted into the
> Commons or sponsored by another Jakarta subproject.
> The sponsoring
> subproject(s) will distribute the code or
> documentation along with the
> rest of their codebase."
>
> Does that seem OK?
>
> -Ted.
=====
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
