[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "20. A CVS repository will be available to all Jakarta committers as a
> > workplace for new packages or other projects. Before release to the
> > public, code or documentation developed here must be accepted into the
> > Commons or sponsored by another Jakarta subproject. The sponsoring
> > subproject(s) will distribute the code or documentation along with the
> > rest of their codebase."
>
> What about:
>
> "The sponsoring project will maintain, support the distributed component
> along with their codebase"
>
> If 2 projects share a component it may be better to have a single point of
> distribution for the component.
> ( they may decide not to place it in commons, but keep it an
> agora component )
I think then one of the subprojects might want to serve as point.
Or, if this takes off, Agora can be proposed on its own, with a separate
CVS.
But a fundamental groundrule is that if you're working on something in
the shared CVS, and release it through another subproject, then what you
do with the codebase is not the concern of the Commons subproject. This
would hold true for any development model people want to try, including
Agora.
-Ted.
