Matt Lee wrote: > James John Eaton wrote: > > >> I have been following this and I agree with Clint. It is the job of the >> client to censor what is submitted so that they are not found guilty of >> any laws that may pertain in their country. >> > > As of today, there are 0 clients that support this. > > So, if you listen to a leaked song, today on Libre.fm... it'll appear on > your profile. Which means that today, I could be subpoenaed for your > information, or more, I believe. Which would include your email address, > etc. > Yes I know. But it would have been the listener that broke the law, and the listener should know the laws of the country he/she lives in. Ignorance of the law is no defence.
What worries me is if libre.fm goes to the trouble of "covering-up" for listeners who are in violation of a law, whether libre.fm or the listener agrees with the law or not, then libre.fm may be breaking the law itself. The last thing I would want is libre.fm being shut down, or the principals suffering Pirate Bay type law cases. James _______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
