On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 19:51 -0400, Matt Lee wrote: > James John Eaton wrote: > > > I have been following this and I agree with Clint. It is the job of the > > client to censor what is submitted so that they are not found guilty of > > any laws that may pertain in their country. > > As of today, there are 0 clients that support this. > > So, if you listen to a leaked song, today on Libre.fm... it'll appear on > your profile. Which means that today, I could be subpoenaed for your > information, or more, I believe. Which would include your email address, > etc.
No offence, but blocking leaked songs based on data from some third party web site is as bad as using RBLs to filter spam. Sure, it might be effective in blocking the stuff you don't want, but it's open to abuse from both attackers targetting your site and censorship by random third parties. /Mike -- ⎊ Michael Gratton. "Mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat." ⎈ <http://web.vee.net/>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
