* Kuno Woudt ([email protected]) wrote: > I understand this would be a useful feature for some users, but I do not > think this should apply to all users. > > -- kuno / warp. >
I agree, I'd be very frustrated by a service that has its fat fingers inside of my data, thinks its smarter then me, and refuses to scrobble what I'm sending. even if it is "good" for me. maybe I want to be unprotected and go to jail? give me that freedom, you are a data aggregator, leave my data alone. I think its ok to have it as an option, and you could extend this, making it possible for users to create/share/subscribe to blacklists, it would probably be simple to implement this with code used by for managing playlists.. it could be called a filter and not a blacklist, and it could be useuful for looking and exploring the data, and not necessarily just for privacy.. and user could have an option to select/create filters for public/friends/specific people you could create new filters by using set operations, like union, etc. and select data on the basis of its tags or strings in name of the artist/song name, etc.. so it would be easy to do anything, an user can select to filter all songs that have tag "ILLEGAL IN BAGDAD" to public visitors, or alternativly use somebody's/somegroups? filter named "ILLEGAL IN BAGDAD"... also, using those filters to look at the data of other people/groups of people would be nice for analyzing listening habits of the world. ivan. -- PGP 0x96085C00 http://lesh.sysphere.org
pgp5OBK10Kdrh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
