https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161941
--- Comment #21 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andras Timar from comment #18) > Eyal, et. al.: if you take the responsibility for your decision, There is no decision. There was just a rash commit before considering the need to bundle these fonts. But if it helps - I am willing to take full responsibility, such as it is, for a back-out. You can tell everyone that this calamity is all my fault :-P To be less facetious: It's a back-out. At any point one could argue for a commit of this bundling and, if that argument is convincing (not convincing me mind you, I have no authority in LO development) - it'll get bundled. > I don't agree with Eyal's naive perception that the project is overly bound > by "process" The perception is of the opposite... this commit was an example of poor process. (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #20) > New is not an immediate revert. In the context of this bug - why? > You and others raised good questions and the ticket is in NI state. And why isn't _that_ immediate revert? The good questions should be discussed before this is committed, not retroactively. As they had not been discussed beforehand, it is appropriate to back out, then have the discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
