https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161941
--- Comment #28 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #27) > Your opinion. Reality is that any commit has passed peer review and is *not* > a mistake. Ah, but that's the point. It's not my opinion. The committer reported the justification, which was a reliance on an unfounded assumption, and we have reasonably established that the assumption is invalid. And as for Caolan - he has told us right here that he doesn't know otherwise (and suggests building without these fonts by default). So we don't have anyone arguing that the commit is beneficial and thus justified. If that was actually being debated (e.g. "is appearance in 5% of documents in a corpus enough for us to bundle a metric equivalent?"), I wouldn't have filed this bug. Commits are not holy because they passed peer review; and mistakes happen. Why the insistence on eternalizing their effects? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
