https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151122
--- Comment #43 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #36) > Filtering is IMO not entirely correct approach etc. List splitting is a good solution. +---------------------+ | Covering Font 1 |V| +---------------------+ | Covering Font 2 | | Covering Font 3 | | ----------------- | | Non-covering font 1 | | Non-covering font 2 | | Non-covering font 3 | | Non-covering font 4 | | (etc. etc.) | +---------------------+ Its benefits: * Can "override" LibreOffice' heuristic if you disagree with it, without the hassle of leaving the drop-down list and figuring out where to change the settings. * With this in place, we can forego a toggle control in the font selection dialog for Filtered/Unfiltered. (Although I would still keep one in Tools | Options somewhere.) Its detriments: * You can forget / lose track of whether you're in the "covering" part of the list of fonts or the "non-covering" part. * A user may fail to understand/notice/realize that there is a partition, or what it means. * Doesn't whittle down the number of items on the list * Cannot express the degree-of-coverage (like a partial gray-out could) So, the detriments are mostly minor and the benefits are significant. I therefore change my mind and currently believe this is the better solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
