https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171232
--- Comment #12 from Danat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #11) > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8) > > Also, would note the "general" behavior of spinbox controls -- <Up> > > increases the value, <Down> decreases the value it is a spinbox, pretty > > consistent that way across the LO UI. Just happens to be the page count in > > this instance. > > I agree, would find it rather confusing to invert the default behavior of > spinboxes to do something else here. > > (In reply to Danat from comment #10) > > I'm sorry if that's off-topic, but I believe that such dilemmas should be > > solved by a board of 20-30 people who are very experienced and > > comprehending, and if their votes are split, then there has to be a > > tie-breaker > > There's a UX/design team and Eyal already added the corresponding > "needsUXEval" keyword (and CC) to notify people in it. > > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #2) > > Michael: can we hijack the increment and decrement events and flip them? Not > > saying I would necessarily advocate for it. > > What could technically work is to handle the key event manually, but as I'm > saying above, I would stick to the default behavior here. Why not just invert the order of the counter itself, like if you click on arrow up - it sends you up, and if you click on arrow down - it sends you down? People will get used to it easily, but they won't get used to is looking at pages going up when you press Down and vice versa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
