https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171404

--- Comment #11 from Jordi PAPA <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to ady from comment #9)
> I think we need some real performance test, comparing the 2 cases (saving as
> ods vs saving as xlsx).
> 
> CC'ing Xisco, any ideas?
> 
> 
> (In reply to m_a_riosv from comment #3)
> > Under Menu > Data > Consolidate, there are thousands of duplicate rows;
> > deleting them will resolve the issue.
> 
> I don't understand. Why would that resolve the "save in ods format" issue?
> The specific data in the file that was previously attached in comment 1 is
> not relevant, as the OP removed the (private) information (and thus
> resulting in empty cells that are repeated row after row, instead of the
> original data, that would be different).
> 
> For the consolidation to be relevant, that would mean actually deleting the
> "unused" rows, not in the dialog but in the original source of data. I
> assume that the OP does not want to delete the original real data – remember
> that the attachment does not include real data.
> 
> I was able to replicate the issue (before the file in comment 1 was
> deleted); saving as ods takes much, much longer than saving as xlsx. Unless
> there is some feature that is not saved at all in xlsx file format (i.e.
> ignored at the time of saving), there is probably some performance issue and
> there might be something to improve, maybe.
> 
> Maybe there is some issue with entire rows or entire columns being
> formatted, or referenced somewhere.
> 
> Or perhaps the many VLOOKUP() functions? Would that imply such difference in
> saving times?
> 
> Analyzing the case "manually" without having some clues would take a lot of
> time – there are 25 worksheets.
> 
> Since 2 different users (plus the OP) have replicated the issue, I am
> setting this to NEW.

Thanks, Ady, for your input.

In my workbook, I don't want to perform any consolidation. I didn't enter the
values ​​in the Data > Consolidate menu.

I checked the data in the ranges involved in the consolidation, and I didn't
see anything suspicious. It's not a problem with empty data.

In the worksheets, I even deleted the affected ranges and created new ones for
my usual workbook calculations: it didn't change anything; the two bugs are
still there.

I noticed that the repeated rows exclusively reference cell "A1" from the first
worksheet (="TvxAscenseur"). After deleting these rows, I inserted a new
worksheet at the beginning of the workbook ("Sheet25") and then saved the
workbook. The unexpected result: now the reference "Sheet25.A1" is repeated
many times for the consolidation data target.

This is therefore proof that the new versions of LIBREOFFICE invent values
​​for consolidation data, by interpreting old deleted values ​​= the reference
to the first cell of the first sheet of the workbook.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to