https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163512
--- Comment #10 from FredrikL <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 208282 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=208282&action=edit Test file with a comment that has a more narrow width than the authour information Thanks a lot for your reply Buovjaga and for taking the time to test the code change. Sorry but I forgot to mention that I had built and tested the code change on a Linux Debian 13 computer with low memory though (4 GB). I actually came up with the code change but Claude guided me to the right file and section where code changes should be done. To build and test the code change I modified: ~/libreoffice/sc/source/core/data/postit.cxx and in a terminal to get to the correct directory: cd libreoffice To build the code change from source (being in the libreoffice directory in the terminal): make sc.build PARALLELISM=1 && make (PARALLELISM=1 I just used to only use one kernel in the CPU because I have such a low memmory on my computer) Run LibreOffice calc and test the code change: ./instdir/program/soffice --calc I actually had the exact result I wanted with the comment on hovering a cell beeing shown the width that it got by default when creating the comment. I don't experience the problems with no comment showing up at all when hoovering no matter what I select in the LibreOffice - Options - LibreOfficeDev Calc - View - Comment Authorship checkbox. I have noticed one problem though and that is probably another bug with the Comment Authorship checkbox in the LibreOffice options. Sometimes when the Comment Authorship checkbox is not checked the Authour information in a comment that is beeing hovered is anyway shown. If the checkbox is selected in the options dialog and is saved and closed and the options dialog is opened again and the checkbox again deselected and the options dialog closed and saved again everything is back to normal again. First I thought that this was a bug introduced with my single row of code change but it turned out not to be on my test computer at least because I build from source again using the original postit.cxx file and the same problem is happening then too. Please note that for some reason on my computer I can not just run: make sc.build PARALLELISM=1 && make For some reason the binary I'm running is not picking up my rebuilt sc module — so I have to run make clean in the sc directory first like this: cd sc make clean cd .. make sc.build PARALLELISM=1 && make I try to attach a sample ods file with a comment to run the tests on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
