https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155087
--- Comment #21 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to BogdanB from comment #8) > About the example with "oua", there are 2 cases: > - the term needs to be changed by autocorrection: "obiceiul de a oua". If > LibreOffice suggests "ouă", you just need to press Ctrl+Z and you get the > right version, without autocorrection > - the term needs to be changed by autocorrection: "a cumparat 10 oua". If > LibreOffice corrects here, it's ok. > > So, it's better to have the duo for "oua"->"ouă" and you decide when to > apply and when not, than to not have the autocorrection. I believe that this is abusing autocorrection, for what grammar checking is for. Additionally, this requires additional effort from the writer, that they need to track what was "corrected", to catch and act on that. The autocorrection tool for any language must be prepared to require the least possible effort from user: the replacements that the tool makes must be correct on 100% cases (well, 99.998% would probably be OK). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
