https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155087
--- Comment #28 from sophie <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #17) > (In reply to cipricus from comment #16) > > (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #15) > > > @cipricus: please don't confirm your own bug. > > > > Sorry. I imagined that what I cannot is already disabled. > No pb. > > > > Romanian speakers are a must (I have done what I could in my previous > > comment myself), but that is not enough. Some general principles in the > > elaboration of those auto-correction lists have to be stated first, > > otherwise we end up arguing against subjective opinions. > You're right, that's why I also "cced" Sophie which is an expert in > localization domain and either will have the background necessary to respond > here or at least will certainly know someone who may help here. Thanks Julien :) My take is this list is only there to correct typos and not to spell check a document or to correct its grammar. If the correction of the typo is ambiguous and could be a valid word, then it should not be the Autocorrect list which is called but either the spell checker or the grammar tool. My advice would be to revisit the list and only keep words with common letter inversion or invariable words, etc. in it for a better user experience and let users customize what they want. Maybe revisiting the list could be a workshop for the next LibOCon :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
