https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155087
--- Comment #24 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Gabriel Masei from comment #22) > If there is a probability, however small, that the suggestion could be wrong > or > the existing form could be a valid one then no auto-correction should be > performed. Please note that the following is just nitpicking on the "however small". Consider English replacement i->I. There *is* a non-zero probability, that the author actually wanted to have the "i" in their text. One case is using it as a Roman numeral; another is just showing an English alphabet letter in the text, and so on. But the replacement rule is useful, because the frequency when i was used incorrectly (I was intended) is *much* higher than the expected use of i. So there is *some* margin of allowable errors here :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
