https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155786

--- Comment #6 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #5)
> I don't know the state of Javascript support in LO but whatever it is, no
> need to deprecate Python cause it's still widely spread or Basic since it
> allows compatibility with VB from MsOffice. About Beanshell, I don't know if
> it's really used or not, I wouldn't be against its deprecation.
> 
> About Javascript, I'm just a spectator of the race of the frameworks,
> reactJS, nodeJS, Angular, ... and wonder if this domain is mature enough or
> if we should wait more.

These are valid concerns, but my arguments against them are:

-There is some momentum to replace or support Python with JS/TS. For example,
because JS/TS is syntactically nicer language (curly brackets etc.).
-Having two fairly similar languages requires ~ double the support, but does it
give double benefit?
-It's not necessary to maintain compatibility with MS Office, and taking this
goal limits the prospects of LO. It's then a choice between whether support for
MS Office is a better goal than designing an independent office software.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to