https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155786
--- Comment #11 from zuebg...@sharklasers.com --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10) > One small addendum: the idea of zuebgirl could stem from the perception that > support of different languages is costly for the project. No it is not; the > architecture of the pluggable scripting machinery only requires a reasonably > compact binding layer, allowing to use the internal published UNO API. The > UNO API, used *universally*, is both the weak and the strong side of OOo/LO; > and the cost of supporting the binding layers is acceptable. The xkcd > reference and everything else is an elitist attitude, allowing OP to think > they can disregard everyone else's needs who use the suite; and is like > saying that every person on the planet must abandon their native language in > favor of language X - just because it's similar to xkcd 927. Yes, but the added cost is seen, for example, in the ports that are attempted to JS/TS now. Fewer people are interested in them now when they can already use them from Python, regardless of what benefits there might be. The result is then two stagnated ecosystems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
