https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155786
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org --- Comment #9 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- Buovjaga can provide an up-to-date reference to the "let us use a better JS library" idea, which itself is fine, but not easy. But the idea that BASIC or Python support could be deprecated (let alone, dropped) is a no-go. Breaking infinite user documents, extensions, home-made or paid-for macros and other automation tools; breaking internal functionality that depends on e.g. Python (e.g., NumberText and its spell-number used in numbering)... As said, if you want to experiment with dropping them, you are free to fork it. Note that it doesn't men that you are advised to fork just to enhance JS support - these are orthogonal. INVALID. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
