https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155786

--- Comment #7 from Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr> ---
(In reply to zuebgirl from comment #6)
> (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #5)
> > I don't know the state of Javascript support in LO but whatever it is, no
> > need to deprecate Python cause it's still widely spread or Basic since it
> > allows compatibility with VB from MsOffice. About Beanshell, I don't know if
> > it's really used or not, I wouldn't be against its deprecation.
> > 
> > About Javascript, I'm just a spectator of the race of the frameworks,
> > reactJS, nodeJS, Angular, ... and wonder if this domain is mature enough or
> > if we should wait more.
> 
> These are valid concerns, but my arguments against them are:
> 
> -There is some momentum to replace or support Python with JS/TS. For
> example, because JS/TS is syntactically nicer language (curly brackets etc.).

I don't see any information about "momentum to replace or support Python" so
could you add some refs?
"syntactically nicer language" thanks to curly brackets, isn't it a bit
subjective? Just a matter of taste for me. Personnally, I'm not against curly
brackets, lots of languages use it (including C++ used for LO) but I appreciate
the elegant way to make block just by indenting in Python.

> -Having two fairly similar languages requires ~ double the support, but does
> it give double benefit?

For those who use Python, it's not a matter to double benefit or not, it's a
matter to be able to program LO or not in Python so 0 or 1.

> -It's not necessary to maintain compatibility with MS Office, and taking
> this goal limits the prospects of LO. It's then a choice between whether
> support for MS Office is a better goal than designing an independent office
> software.
Since LO wants to support docx, xlsx, etc. in addition to odt, ods, ... I
suppose it's necessary. If it's not the case, it would mean to dump OOXML
support completely since quite some people, above all in companies, use macros,
so not sure LO people would be ok but I may be wrong.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to