You don't *asterisk* need to make a *asterisk* derivative work from nd sources. Just write an *asterisk* original work about it.
This is *asterisk* actually what the FSF and GNU ppl want you to do. They do *asterisk* not want to be the central source for all things free, either. Just say it in your own *asterisk* words! On 05/25/2015 05:18 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > And the ND clause helps this HOW? > > I think ND is *hurting* our cause and *increasing* the misrepresentation > by discouraging some amount of positive derivative works that are > *aligned* with FSF values. > > On 05/24/2015 10:15 PM, Will Hill wrote: >> I suppose the easiest way to demonstrate the misrepresentation is to ask an >> IT >> person about the FSF. If you can't remember your own surprise on first >> reading actual GNU and FSF material, you will probably be surprised by the >> average IT person's skewed perceptions. They are likely to tell you some >> confused things about "Open Source", "freeware", "hobbiest", etc. The >> general public is even less well informed. The last thing you might hear is >> a clear understanding of the power non free software has over users and what >> it takes to undo that. >> >> This problem of misrepresentation is not unique to free software. Rich and >> powerful people devote significant resources to confusing the public about >> all sorts of things. >> >> On Friday 22 May 2015, [email protected] wrote: >>> will hill" easy to observe pattern of publishers missrepresenting GNU >>> and the FSF by all means at their disposal" >> --
0xE1A91299.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
