The relevant question isn't "does anyone misrepresent RMS", the question is "are there examples of misrepresentation that violate the CC-BY-ND license and would not be violations of CC-BY-SA" because those are the only sort that the ND license discussion is relevant to.
I could look through your references, but since you looked at them already, you'd be faster at identifying answers to whether any fit this question. On 05/22/2015 11:27 PM, Will Hill wrote: > You might remember the "RMS is a sexist" fiasco, where all sorts of articles > poured out misrepresenting the Virgin of Emacs as the thing it parodies. > That's a minor but nasty example. Software owners are constantly staging > these things while their advertising and other messages are completely > degraded. > > This is a systematic thing and your question has encouraged me to finish up a > few essays I've been working on. Some suggested reading includes, > > http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20071023002351958 > http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/microsoft-evilness-galore/ > http://techrights.org/2008/12/27/microsoft-shills-aka-te-secrets/ > http://www.catb.org/esr/halloween/halloween1.html > http://archive09.linux.com/articles/38081 > http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20100312150121798 > http://techrights.org/2009/03/16/smear-campaigns-against-foss-proponents/ > http://techrights.org/2008/03/17/manufacturing-abuse/ > http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/03/enough_about_me.html > http://techrights.org/2009/05/02/perception-management-at-microsoft/ > http://www.cypherpunks.to/~peter/zdnet.html > > > > On Friday 22 May 2015, [email protected] wrote: >> will hill" easy to observe pattern of publishers missrepresenting GNU >> and the FSF by all means at their disposal" >> >> examples? > > > -- Aaron Wolf co-founder, Snowdrift.coop music teacher, wolftune.com
