Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 01:27:03 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed ..
cf is more expensive then SM? i know 256meg cards are under 100 bucks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 1:06 AM Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 06:58:55 +0000 > From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > > >Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:08:50 +0800 > >From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > > > >At 09:57 PM 16/03/2002 -0800, you wrote: > > >Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 05:50:25 +0000 > > >From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > > > > > >>Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:44:23 +0800 > > >>From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > > >> > > >>At 08:45 PM 16/03/2002 -0800, you wrote: > > >>>Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 04:36:51 +0000 > > >>>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>Subject: Re: [LIB] OT, SmartMedia size V speed .. > > > ^^I'll just leave this for comrades with a twisted sense of humor^^ > > > > >>>One reason CF cards are more expensive it would seem. > > >> > > >>Umm ... you lost me there ... > > > > > >As usual, that makes two of us Raymond... After your explanation of how > >buffers work, I'm wondering myself. I thought CF cards had more built into > >them that made them both more expensive, and more responsive. Don't recall > >having to wait to very long for the pix to process in my Nikon... but maybe > >I haven't shot 5-6 pix in quick succession lately. > > > >Well my point is, the fact that its CF shouldn't make any difference to the > >speed ... all that changes is the controller electronics move from the card > >to the camera. In fact you'd expect SM to be a bit faster because you could > >afford to have better controlling electronics in the camera than in the > >card as you're likely to have more cards than cameras. I think the > >difference in speed between the 2 SM cards might well just be the > >difference in the quality of chips used (2 cards from the same maker could > >contain chips made by very different companies).< > > > Hmmm.... then I wonder what the heck I get out of my CF card to merit the > expensive!? > > M. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > ************************************************************** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ************************************************************** _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ************************************************************** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **************************************************************
