On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sean McBride <s...@rogue-research.com>wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:01:39 +0100, Pete Batard said:
>
> >Now, if a dependency on CMake is preferable, I'm not closing the door on
> >either (After all, I did add Vitali's CMake support in my branch when he
> >proposed it), but I'd like to hear what others have to say.
>
> I just forked libusbx on github and tried to build it. README.git says
> "run either ./autogen.sh or ./bootstrap.sh" but both result in:
>
> libtoolize or glibtoolize was not found! Please install libtool.
>
> autotools used to be part of Xcode, but was removed as of 4.3 (March 2012).
>
> Other than finding and installing 'libtoolize', is there another way to
> build?
>
> One solution would be to support CMake. Another would be to include an
> Xcode project, just like Visual Studio projects are currently included.
>
> As CMake can build Xcode projects, VS projects (of various versions), and
> makefiles, it seems like it would be much less maintance.
>
Then it sounds like it would be best to include an Xcode project. I'm sure
it would be quicker to just do it than 'discuss' it.
Personally, I think it's better to supply native build methods than to try
to force autotools to work on systems that don't support it.
Orin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
