> I have to disagree. I agree with many of Richard's concepts, (although I > still don't call it GNU/Linux *G*) but for hardware I have to seriously > disagree. There are already systems (Amiga, iirc) which use the Linux kernel outside the GNU system.. in proprietary systems even. Regrettably, their claims that they now use Linux are absolutely correct, and will lead people to believe that they're using an entire free/open system, instead of just the free kernel. Until this, GNU/Linux has been easier to abbreviate as simply Linux, but now that it could be confusing (and potentially damaging to both the Free Software and Open Source movements) I'll be using GNU/Linux far more regularly, and suggest you do the same (imagine Microsoft inserting the Linux kernel into NT, making it even more bloated and unstable in the process, and completely legitimately selling it as Linux in order to discredit us). Kris Coward
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Andrew J Bromage
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardwar... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Har... Angelo Schneider
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: gEDA: Re: [openip] Re: GNU License f... "B�rgeStrand"
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Brian J. Fox
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling

