> I agree that the term "free software" is not perfectly clear. There > seems to be no better alternative in English--all the alternatives > have flaws of their own. English has no everyday word analogous to > "libre" which means "free as in freedom, not as in price." > > It's unfortunate that such an important language has such an important > gap. If the word lacks, invent it and explain it. GNU is an established term. Let's call it GNUware and explain the free [speach|beer] stuff to the people who don't get it at once. (If you feel like flaming, please read below and hold your horses for a little while.) -- B�rge P.S. I'm sorry to keep up this traffic on geda-dev, being the one who suggested a split. What's the status on an alternative list coming up so that we can post there and skip these long cc lines?
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Reto Stamm
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Andrew J Bromage
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardwar... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Har... Angelo Schneider
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware "B�rgeStrand"
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Brian J. Fox
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan

