I am looking for a GPL-like license, but it is intended for
collections of data resources, for the time being linguistic resources:
corpora, dictionnaries (as used by machines, not people), grammars
I see no reason why the GPL could not be used.
If you think you see an obstacle, please describe it to me
privately, and I will ask our lawyer if it is really a problem.
- Re: "rights" and ... Bernard Lang
- Re: "rights" and ... Kristofer Coward
- Re: "rights" and ... Pete Schaeffer
- Re: "rights" and ... David Johnson
- Re: "rights" and ... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: "rights" and ... David Johnson
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardware Reto Stamm
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardwar... Andrew J Bromage
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardwar... Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Har... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for... Angelo Schneider
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU Licens... Bernard Lang
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU Licens... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU Licens... Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU Licens... Richard Stallman
- Re: [openip] Re: GNU License for Hardwar... Richard Stallman
- Re: gEDA: Re: [openip] Re: GNU Licen... "B�rgeStrand"
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Sven LUTHER

