Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I ship and sell binary only products, so I have an interest in not > > > > > restricting people. > > > > > > > > Other than your customers, presumably. Restrictions cut both ways. > > > > > > In what way would a restrict cut both ways here? > > > > Binary only products restrict your customers, by comparison to source > > code products. I'm not questioning your decision to sell binary only > > products; I'm just pointing out that by following a scheme of not > > restricting module distributors, you are choosing to restrict module > > users. It's not a case of ``not restricting people,'' as you put it; > > it's a case of choosing which restrictions to use. > > ``not restricting'' access to my house when the bank issues a forclosure > (sp). I am here to sell to cover my costs, build a small war chest. > Dump the product to opensource at that point and move to the next > generation of new technology. > > Develop, Sell, War Chest, Release :: repeat > > What more could the open source want, other than to confuse "wishes and > horses" ?
I repeat, I'm not questioning your decision to sell binary only products. I won't bother repeating my actual point again. Ian -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3