On 1 January 2013 17:08, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Rick Moen wrote: >> >> I conclude that, in general, the overwhelming majority of such >> entrepreneurs are thus seeking the crippling of competing commercial >> reuse -- not just attribution. So, OSI should give them the bum's rush. > > Is the GPL also considered > unfree when applied to libraries?
Many would argue, yes. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
