On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Rick Moen wrote:
I conclude that, in general, the overwhelming majority of such entrepreneurs are thus seeking the crippling of competing commercial reuse -- not just attribution. So, OSI should give them the bum's rush.
Some people use ordinary GPL on libraries with the intent of crippling competing commercial reuse (since any competitors have to release their source and competitors wouldn't want to do that). Is the GPL also considered unfree when applied to libraries? _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
